Wednesday, May 18, 2016

First Toe Wall Test

Tonight the first testing of a toe wall was done. Below is a picture of the set up once the bricks were removed from the soil.

Measurements were taken before the bricks were placed, immediately after the bricks were placed, and 30 minutes after the bricks were placed. Before pressure was applied, the angle was approximately 32.26 degrees. As the pressure was applied there was visual degradation. Some of the soil compressed while a lot of it slid down the slope. The angle changed 11.45% between these two stages. After 30 minutes the new angle was 27.93 degrees. This was only a 2.21% decrease from immediately after the bricks were placed. While there was still soil degradation, this test of the toe wall showed less change than the pressure applied without a barrier. 

It is important to note that at approximately seven minutes in one of the bricks being used for applied pressure fell from the slope. It was replaced so that the simulation could continue. This may have also been a cause of error in this test. However, it can be viewed as success because it may have fallen from a gradual loss of soil from beneath it. We want an unstable slope to begin with so we can test our methods to see if they prevent/slow degradation. 

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

Results from New Pressure Test Design

The results from the new pressure test design were consistent with degradation of soil, as the slope angle decreased by 3.83%. The measurements from the height, slope, and bottom did not change as expected. The slope actually decreased instead of increasing, the bottom increased very slightly, and the height remained almost exactly the same. We think the change in angle came from a compression of the soil rather than the soil sliding but both are issues within soil erosion. The measurements were taken from immediately after bricks were placed and after 30 minutes of them being on top of the soil.

This new style of testing can have improvements in the future, such as where to place the bricks. If we decide to continue using the new design of slope, it will be carried on through toe wall and rain simulation testing.

New Pressure Test Design

In previous trials a small ledge was made at the top of the slope to create a place to place bricks, like so:

This structure is actually very stable and shows little changes, so the group decided to try another form of test test slope:

Not only is there more immediate change, bu the measurements are slightly easier, though there are more. The bricks are placed on the slop and allowed to shift the soil downward. measurements are taken before the placement, immediately after the placement and 30 mins after placement. This test is still in the trial stage, so moving forward it may or may not be the standard. 

Current Research

The strength of the wall varies depending on factors such as the materials used, the design of the wall and the type of soil behind the wall. However, one factor remains constant between all walls, water pressure behind the wall. This factor can make or break most walls. The toe wall's defense is proper irrigation.Without this system, the wall is bound to have a short lifespan.





"Built right, he says, a retaining wall can outlast most people. But like any structure, their lifespan depends on how they're built. A wall built of railroad ties isn't likely to last as long as one made of concrete blocks, but even a concrete block wall can fail early. A lot of factors play into lifespan including: the soil type behind the wall, drainage around the wall, the material the wall is made of, and how strong the wall's foundation is.

"There's a lot of different ways to design [walls]," he says. "Ensuring that there's low water and water pressure behind [the wall] is critical.""

Walls Come Tumbling Down, J. Adrian Stanley, (Article found Here)





Rain Control Test

Last week, 3 tests were preformed, 2 pressure and 1 rain test. Unfortunately measurement errors made during the pressure tests that made the data unusable. The rain test data, however, was viable. The test preformed without pressure or an upper shelf on the slope. The rate of rain was 1.5 inches per hour and the slope was subjected to the rain simulation for 30 minutes. Measurements showed that that the angle of the left slope decreased by 8.8% and the right side angle of the slope by 9.4%. Qualitative investigation showed that there was erosion, but on very small, and near impossible to measure scale. This team has the ability to perform a test that will simulate approximately 6.5 inch/hour rain. this simulation may be subjected to the slope.  

Week 8 Lab

The goal for the lab today is to test the toe wall and grid system under pressure to see if there is a difference from the control data.